{"created":"2023-06-20T15:56:18.599799+00:00","id":270,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"240b346c-75a2-4e56-9f12-f11b750ea77d"},"_deposit":{"created_by":20,"id":"270","owners":[20],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"270"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:agi.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000270","sets":["1","1:40"]},"author_link":["308"],"control_number":"270","item_10007_date_8":{"attribute_name":"報告年度","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_date_issued_datetime":"2021-03","subitem_date_issued_type":"Issued"}]},"item_10007_description_13":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This report presents the research results implemented during April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 of the Research Project on “Do enterprise zones promote local business development? Evidence from Vietnam”.\nDeveloping countries are using enterprise zones for development, and private partnerships with zone infrastructure developers (ZIDs) have become common.\nDeveloping countries account for 76 percent of all enterprise zones worldwide (Akinci etal., 2008). Developing countries are using enterprise zones to promote economic activity (exports) and attract foreign direct investment (FDI). The zones are not necessarily located in distressed areas of developing countries. In developed countries, on the other hand, enterprise zones are usually located in distressed areas to increase employment and income (Neumark & Simpson, 2015). The zones are characterized by public infrastructure investment, subsidies, and tax incentives. Typical examples in developed countries are the Tennessee Valley Authority in the US, EU Structural Funds, the US Federal Zone Program, California State Enterprise Zones, and French Enterprise Zones.\nAlthough developing countries are also using similar forms, the private sector has developed and operated 62 percent of all zones in developing countries (Akinci, 2008: page 10, 20). Therefore, developing enterprise zones to attract (foreign) firms to nondistressed areas and allowing the involvement of the private sector are new practices.\nHowever, these new practices are not without critics. The involvement of the private sector in zone infrastructure development may create conflicts of interests and compromise the original zone policies. If zones pursue export activities, zone-based firms would tend to produce low added-value products—low-skill assembly and importdependent FDI. Foot-lose FDI may result in no (technology) spillover effects on local businesses because the FDI firms might not use any inputs from local businesses. Firms might simply reallocate business activities into the zone from elsewhere such that the stock of firms would remain the same. Firms might also open a tiny office in the zone to reap the policy benefits—so-called mailbox effects (Briant et al., 2015). These new practices raise both existing questions that have been explored in developed countries and a new question pertaining specifically to developing countries. The existing questions are whether zone policies can promote local economic development and whether the policies are Pareto efficient (Neumark and Kolko, 2010; Givord et al., 2013; Hanson and Rohlin, 2013; Kline and Moretti, 2014; Fishback, 2017). The new question is whether the involvement of the private sector in the zone development compromises the effectiveness of the policies. Researchers in economics may be wary of spillover effects in the sense that the effects are evidence of bias in impact evaluations. However, spillover effects are what policy makers in developing countries want to measure. Positive spillover effects imply the vitalization of local businesses as an externality.\nTherefore, Professor Hiroyuki Yamada (Keio University) and I conducted analysis on the effects of Vietnamese enterprise zones on local businesses based on different patterns of place-based policies as well as the ownership structure of the zone infrastructure developers (ZIDs). We constructed a panel of communes during 2000–2007 using a census survey of firms having more than nine employees and a census of zones and zonebased firms. We found that place-based policies led to growth in the number of jobs and firms in the communes where enterprise zones were located, even after excluding zonebased firms.\nWe thank insightful comments from Lianming Zhu, and participants from the workshop of the Kyushu University, 2019 Econometric Society Australasian Meeting, 2019 Autumn Meetings of the Japanese Economic Association, 2020 World Congress of the Econometric Society for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) KAKENHI Grant Number 18K12784, 18K01580, 19H00619, and 20H01506, project grants from the Asian Growth Research Institute, Kyushu University, and Keio Gijuku Academic Development Funds.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10007_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43","subitem_version_type":"NA"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-01-27"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"report2020-05.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.1 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_4","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"report2020-05","url":"https://agi.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/270/files/report2020-05.pdf"},"version_id":"284e9fcd-d635-4397-986f-72a0bd7f6807"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_researcher":{"attribute_name":"研究代表者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorAffiliations":[{"affiliationNameIdentifiers":[{"affiliationNameIdentifierScheme":"ISNI","affiliationNameIdentifierURI":"http://www.isni.org/isni/"}],"affiliationNames":[{"affiliationNameLang":"ja"}]}],"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Vu, Manh Tien","creatorNameLang":"en"},{"creatorName":"ヴ, マン・ティエン","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"familyNames":[{"familyName":"Vu","familyNameLang":"en"},{"familyName":"ヴ","familyNameLang":"ja"}],"givenNames":[{"givenName":"Manh Tien","givenNameLang":"en"},{"givenName":"マン・ティエン","givenNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"308","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"research report","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws"}]},"item_title":"Do enterprise zones promote local business development? Evidence from Vietnam","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"Do enterprise zones promote local business development? Evidence from Vietnam","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10007","owner":"20","path":["1","40"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2023-01-27"},"publish_date":"2023-01-27","publish_status":"0","recid":"270","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["Do enterprise zones promote local business development? Evidence from Vietnam"],"weko_creator_id":"20","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-04-23T06:20:34.868320+00:00"}